nanog mailing list archives
Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:39:59 +1000
In message <1BC921A3-C4CD-4FFF-9AE5-49C1218D5191 () virtualized org>, David Conrad writes:
On Jun 19, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:I would guess that most of these are going to be purchased simply to prevent someone else from getting themI would agree with this part.I suspect you underestimate the desires and power of marketing folks at = larger organizations.Adding gtlds and opening up the root to brands effectively requires TM holders to register/bid to protect their TM rights. =20Not really. You might want to search on "trademark" in = http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf. = There has been a tremendous amount of traffic on that particular issue = and that is reflected in the Applicant Guidebook.It will be even more interesting if ICANN looses and has to roll back brand =delegationsit has made.Really, if you're going to opine on the disasters that will befall ICANN = as a result of the new gTLD program, you might want to actually read = what that program does and doesn't do. Really. Regards, -drc
I'm curious how anyone that has not signed a agreement with ICANN can be bound to anything in any applicant guide book. Also rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf basically deals with <tm>.<gtld>. on a brief skimming not <tm> or is ICANN going to have a sunrise period for "."? Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: future revenue at risk vs near term cost ratio, (continued)
- Re: future revenue at risk vs near term cost ratio Doug Barton (Jun 20)
- Message not available
- Re: future revenue at risk vs near term cost ratio Tim Chown (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Tony Finch (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Tony Finch (Jun 21)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- RE: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs George Bonser (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Robert Bonomi (Jun 20)
- RE: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs George Bonser (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John R. Levine (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 20)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Matthew Palmer (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)