nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIP Justification
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:11:40 -0400
As it was explained to me, the main difference is that you can have $lots of prefixes in IS-IS without it falling over, whereas Dijkstra is far more resource-intensive and as such OSPF doesn't get too happy after $a_lot_less prefixes. Those numbers can be debated as you like, but I think if you were to redist bgp ospf on a lab machine you'd get the point. Disclaimer: I've never run IS-IS operationally, just in the lab. -Jack
Which makes no sense to me. I originally looked at both and thought OSPF to be inferior to IS-IS. That being said, OSPF is supported on more (and cheaper) hardware. IS-IS can have additional licensing with some hardware (where OSPF does not) and is often considered a "service provider" protocol by vendors. Jack
Current thread:
- Re: RIP Justification, (continued)
- Re: RIP Justification John Kristoff (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Glen Kent (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Scott Morris (Sep 30)
- RE: RIP Justification George Bonser (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Marshall Eubanks (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- RE: RIP Justification Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Bates (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification John Kristoff (Sep 30)