nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIP Justification
From: Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:44:48 -0400
Maybe I WAY under-read the initial poster's question, but I was pretty sure he wasn't talking about running it as a CORE routing protocol or anything on the middle of their network where MPLS would be expected on top of it! If I missed it and he did intend that, then I'd certainly agree with you (among many other reasons why it would be a horrible idea)! ;) Scott On 9/30/10 12:59 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
RIP cannot also be used for traffic engineering; so if you want MPLS then you MUST use either OSPF or ISIS. RIP, like any other distance vector protocol, converges extremely slowly - so if you want faster convergence then you have to use one of ISIS or OSPF. Glen
Current thread:
- Re: RIP Justification, (continued)
- Re: RIP Justification Chris Woodfield (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Scott Morris (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Yasuhiro Ohara (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Chris Woodfield (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Owen DeLong (Sep 29)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Bates (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Bates (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification John Kristoff (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Glen Kent (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Scott Morris (Sep 30)
- RE: RIP Justification George Bonser (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Marshall Eubanks (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- RE: RIP Justification Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Bates (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Heath Jones (Sep 30)