Re: RIP Justification

["Guerra, Ruben" <Ruben.Guerra () arrisi com>]

I am with Scott on this one.. I took the initial question as a focus on the edge... not the CORE. RIP is perfect for 
the edge to commercial CPEs. Why would want to run OSPF/ISIS at the edge. I would hope that it would be common practice 
to not use RIP in the CORE....

peace
--
Ruben Guerra
--------- Sent from my Nokia N900

----- Original message -----
> Haha It's all good :)
> You are right about IS-IS being less resource intensive than OSPF, and
> that it scales better!
>
>
>
> On 30 September 2010 23:50, Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com<mailto:jack () crepinc com>> wrote:
> > > Both OSPF and IS-IS use Dijkstra. IS-IS isn't as widely used because
> > > of the ISO addressing. Atleast thats my take on it..
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake. I'll go sit in my corner now...
> > -Jack