nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIP Justification
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:32:12 -0400
I was just curious - why would IS-IS be more die-hard than OSPF or iBGP?
It's like running apps on Solaris and Oracle these days instead of Linux and MySQL. Both options work if you know what you're doing, but it's way easier (and cheaper) to hire admins for the latter. When was the last time you ran into a younger neteng designing his topology who went "Yes! IS-IS!"? It works fine (very well in fact) but it's just less used. I know there are a lot of guys on here using IS-IS and I'm certainly not knocking it... </flamewarprotection> -Jack
Current thread:
- Re: RIP Justification, (continued)
- Re: RIP Justification Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Bates (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification John Kristoff (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Glen Kent (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Scott Morris (Sep 30)
- RE: RIP Justification George Bonser (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Marshall Eubanks (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- RE: RIP Justification Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Bates (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Heath Jones (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Jack Carrozzo (Sep 30)
- Re: RIP Justification Heath Jones (Sep 30)