nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:16:53 +0100
On 2010-03-18 19:35, Jared Mauch wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?q=1.2.3.4+site%3Acisco.com I know that the University of Michigan utilize 1.2.3.4 for their captive portal login/logout pages as recently as monday when I was on the medical campus.
A lot of cheap, low-end devices (sometimes with names of well-know vendors) use IPs like 1.1.1.1 and 1.2.3.4 as captive portal IPs to authenticate connecting clients. A lot of "WLAN hotspots" users will have problems reaching 1/8 unless they connect via VPN to corporate and browse from there or something like that. The question is how soon 1/8 will have interesting content to serve, as I know at least one popular hotel chain in Europe using "1.1.1.1". -- "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
Current thread:
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US, (continued)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Cian Brennan (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jared Mauch (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US William Allen Simpson (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Matt Shadbolt (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Charles Mills (Mar 19)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Craig Vuljanic (Mar 19)
- RE: Using private APNIC range in US Eric J Esslinger (Mar 19)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Graham Beneke (Mar 20)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Łukasz Bromirski (Mar 20)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Daniel Senie (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US gordon b slater (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US gordon b slater (Mar 18)