RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

["John Lightfoot" <jlightfoot () gmail com>]

That's Hedley.

-----Original Message-----
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com [mailto:bmanning () vacation karoshi com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
To: Simon Perreault
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
> > On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks 
> > up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound 
> > connection for anonymity purposes.
>
> That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating 
> systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.

        not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars 
        patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.

--bill