nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01]
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:58:44 -0400
Isn't "global addresses you can take with you when you change providers" kind of the definition of Provider Independent address space? If you want to keep the same addresses when you change providers, you just need to get a PI allocation. --Richard On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:25:46 -0400 Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:While I think this is an improvement, unless the distribution of ULA-C is no cheaper and no easier to get than GUA, I still think there is reason to believe that it is likely ULA-C will become de facto GUA over the long term. As such, I still think the current draft is a bad idea absent appropriate protections in RIR policy.I agree with owen, mostly... except I think we should just push RIR's to make GUA accessible to folks that need ipv6 adress space, regardless of connectiivty to thegreater 'internet' (for some definition of that thing). ULA of all types causes headaches on hosts, routers, etc. There is no reason to go down that road, just use GUA (Globally Unique Addresses).So what happens when you change providers? How are you going to keep using globals that now aren't yours? I'm also curious about these headaches. What are they?-Chris
Current thread:
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01], (continued)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Christopher Morrow (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Jack Bates (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Stephen Sprunk (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 26)
- RE: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Tony Hain (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Bill Stewart (Apr 29)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Owen DeLong (Apr 29)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Mans Nilsson (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] sthaug (Apr 26)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] Richard Barnes (Apr 22)
- Re: [Re: http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac-01] bmanning (Apr 21)