nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Charles Mills <w3yni1 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:17:56 -0400
I think he was actually quoting the movie. They always called Harvey Korman's character "Hedy" and he'd always correct them with "That's Hedley" in a most disapproving tone. You had to have watched that movie way too many times (much to my wife's chagrin) to catch the subtle joke. On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote:
Actually, no. Not from the Mel Brooks movie. Hedy Lamarr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr Hedy Lamarr (November 9, 1914 - January 19, 2000) was an Austrian-born American actress and engineer. Though known primarily for her film career as a major contract star of MGM's "Golden Age", she also co-invented an early form of spread spectrum communications technology, a key to modern wireless communication.[1] ---- Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139-----Original Message----- From: John Lightfoot [mailto:jlightfoot () gmail com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:05 AM To: bmanning () vacation karoshi com; 'Simon Perreault' Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? That's Hedley. -----Original Message----- From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com [mailto:bmanning () vacation karoshi com] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM To: Simon Perreault Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound connection for anonymity purposes.That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 25)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jim Burwell (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Clue Store (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jim Burwell (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Clue Store (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Joe Greco (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? bmanning (Apr 22)
- RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? John Lightfoot (Apr 22)
- RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Matthew Huff (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Charles Mills (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Larry Sheldon (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Larry Sheldon (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 24)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mohacsi Janos (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 23)