nanog mailing list archives
Re: the alleged evils of NAT,
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:26:42 -0500 (CDT)
"John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com> writes:Did you run any services?Of course not, it's consumer DSL. I run services on my server which is somewhere else and tunnel in via ssh which, of course, works fine through NAT.Take a look at all those small SOHO storage boxes. They all offer web and FTP services and they all support something like dyndns. Customers want these features and are using these features.
For any such feature on such devices, it would be more honest for the purposes of debate to state that as "Some customers want these features [...]" which is completely true. There are a lot of features in a lot of devices that are never used by (a few, some, most, etc) end users, and even where they are used, the existence of web or ftp services on a storage appliance may merely mean that a user finds it more convenient to access the device locally that way... rather than setting up SMB etc. It certainly does not imply that all customers who buy the SuperStorageDeviceWithFTPCapability are running public FTP archives and that NAT becomes a problem for the owners of all those devices. It may be a problem for a percentage of them, though. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Andrews (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? John Levine (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Simon Perreault (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jack Bates (Apr 20)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? John R. Levine (Apr 20)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 20)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Eliot Lear (Apr 20)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 20)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jens Link (Apr 21)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, Joe Greco (Apr 21)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Andy Davidson (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Matthew Kaufman (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Nick Hilliard (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jon Lewis (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jon Lewis (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Jon Lewis (Apr 27)
- Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Owen DeLong (Apr 27)