Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[bmanning () vacation karoshi com]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:24:57PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <201004200022.o3K0M2Ba007459 () aurora sol net>, Joe Greco writes:
> > > That'd be easy if you were just starting up an ISP. What do you do with
> > > your existing customer base? If their current service includes a
> > > dynamic public IPv4 address, you can't gracefully take it away, without
> > > likey violating services T&Cs, government telco regulations etc. So
> > > you'll have to go through a formal process of getting agreement with
> > > customers to take them away.
> >
> > I haven't seen any such documents or regulations.
>
> People purchaced the service on the understanding that they would
> get a Internet address.  A address behind a NAT is not a Internet
> address, it's a *shared* Internet address which is a very different
> thing.

        whats an "Internet" address?  and are you sure thats part of 
        the service offering?

> Mark Andrews, ISC

--bill