nanog mailing list archives

Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives


From: Paolo Lucente <pl+list () pmacct net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:29 +0000

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:

Caveat: no MAC accounting on LAGs (IEEE speak) / Aggregated Ethernet (Juniper
speak) / Etherchannels (Cisco speak).

Might or might not be important when using bundled links to public
peering fabrics.

Or for the very same goal, vendors can maybe think at making support
for L2 primitives via NetFlow v9 exports somewhat more implemented.

Cheers,
Paolo



Current thread: