nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives
From: Paolo Lucente <pl+list () pmacct net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:10:29 +0000
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
Caveat: no MAC accounting on LAGs (IEEE speak) / Aggregated Ethernet (Juniper speak) / Etherchannels (Cisco speak). Might or might not be important when using bundled links to public peering fabrics.
Or for the very same goal, vendors can maybe think at making support for L2 primitives via NetFlow v9 exports somewhat more implemented. Cheers, Paolo
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives, (continued)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Daniel Roesen (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Randy Bush (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 16)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Jack Bates (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Paul Cosgrove (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Phil Pierotti (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives sthaug (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Tony Varriale (Nov 18)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Paolo Lucente (Nov 17)
- Re: Juniper M120 Alternatives Kevin Oberman (Nov 16)
- Fiber Cut in Italy Varaillon Jean Christophe (Nov 16)
- Re: Fiber Cut in Italy Hank Nussbacher (Nov 16)
- RE: Fiber Cut in Italy Varaillon Jean Christophe (Nov 16)
- Re: Fiber Cut in Italy Leonardo Rizzi (Nov 16)
- RE: Fiber Cut in Italy Hank Nussbacher (Nov 16)