nanog mailing list archives
Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:42:11 +0700
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Some things just don't active/active nicely on a budget.
Sure, because of inefficient legacy design choices.Distribution and scale is ultimately an application architecture issue, with networking and ancillary technologies playing an important supporting role.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton
Current thread:
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity, (continued)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Bill Woodcock (Jun 03)
- RE: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Jim Wise (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Seth Mattinen (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Jim Wise (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)