nanog mailing list archives
Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:40:34 +0700
On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:36 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Sometimes you're limited by the need to use applications which aren't capable of running on more than one server at a time.
All understood - which is why it's important that app devs/database folks/sysadmins are all part of the virtual team working to uplift legacy siloed OS/app stacks into more modern and flexible architectures.
;> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton
Current thread:
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity, (continued)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Brandon Galbraith (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Bill Woodcock (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Brandon Galbraith (Jun 03)
- RE: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Jim Wise (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Seth Mattinen (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Jim Wise (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)