nanog mailing list archives
Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity
From: gb10hkzo-nanog () yahoo co uk
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Some things just don't active/active nicely on a budget.
Sure, because of inefficient legacy design choices.
Roland, I'm not sure I understand your argument here. Budget is very much an issue when choosing between active/active and active/passive. Nothing to do with "inefficient legacy design". For example, consider the licensing and hardware costs involved in running something like Oracle Database in active/active mode (in a topology that is supported by Oracle Tech Support).
Current thread:
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity, (continued)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity gb10hkzo-nanog (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity William Herrin (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Seth Mattinen (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)
- Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity Roland Dobbins (Jun 03)