nanog mailing list archives

Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity


From: gb10hkzo-nanog () yahoo co uk
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:13:12 -0700 (PDT)


Tell me about it ...... "failover test.... what failover test"  ;-)



----- Original Message ----
From: William Herrin <herrin-nanog () dirtside com>
To: gb10hkzo-nanog () yahoo co uk
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Wednesday, 3 June, 2009 16:05:15
Subject: Re: Facility wide DR/Continuity

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 AM, <gb10hkzo-nanog () yahoo co uk> wrote:
- whether you are after an active/active or active/passive solution

In practice, active/passive DR solutions often fail. You rarely need
to fail over to the passive system. When you finally do need to fail
over, there are a dozen configuration changes that didn't make it from
the active system, so the passive system isn't in a runable state.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004






Current thread: