nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:10:57 +0100 (CET)
Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the tools we have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?You don't, because there isn't really a technical reason for turning off RA.
I'm glad to see that several of the big vendors seem to disagree with you. - Cisco does RA as soon as an interface has an IPv6 address, but has a knob to disable RA (ipv6 nd ra suppress). - Juniper does *not* do RA as soon as an interface has an IPv6 address, it must be explicitly configured. So we are part way there - IPv6 can be used without RA. We just need DHCPv6 to work properly without RA. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Daniel Senie (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Christopher Morrow (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mohacsi Janos (Feb 19)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion sthaug (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Owen DeLong (Feb 18)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Greedy Routing Rod Beck (Feb 18)
- Re: Greedy Routing Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- RE: Greedy Routing Deepak Jain (Feb 18)
- RE: Greedy Routing Jake Mertel (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)