nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion


From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:08:54 -0500

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:55:19PM -0700, Aria Stewart wrote:

On 18/02/2009 19:39, Kevin Loch wrote:
Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the  
tools we
have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?

What operational reasons are there for working with RA turned off?

I don't want any system to be able to get IPv6 addressing information 
until the system has been identified in our central management system.  
I also want the IPv6 address assignment to be made centrally.


Current thread: