nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:08:54 -0500
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:55:19PM -0700, Aria Stewart wrote:
On 18/02/2009 19:39, Kevin Loch wrote:Just how DO we get the message to the IETF that we need all the tools we have in v4 (DHCP, VRRP, etc) to work with RA turned off?What operational reasons are there for working with RA turned off?
I don't want any system to be able to get IPv6 addressing information until the system has been identified in our central management system. I also want the IPv6 address assignment to be made centrally.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Paul Ferguson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mark Smith (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)