nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:29:22 +0100 (CET)
Hi!
networks with visitors have shown a serious problem with rouge RAs
Does that get better with RAs from the good routers turned off? Aria Stewart aredridel () nbtsc org
Is there something like RA filtering on switches yet, so end users can be filtered? Just like the dhcp stuff thats available on most switches nowdays... ?
Its as annoying as fake DHCP servers... Bye, Raymond.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Tony Hain (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion sthaug (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)