nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:29:27 -0600
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Is there something like RA filtering on switches yet, so end users can be filtered? Just like the dhcp stuff thats available on most switches nowdays... ?Its as annoying as fake DHCP servers...
Per customer VLAN isolation (common to solve DHCP server issues). You can also perform *some* filtering today for multicast addresses, but not the specific packets themselves from what I've seen. This is a big implementation change. I've had lengthy discussions with the DSLAM vendors who said, "VLANs are stupid and as bad as PVCs," about their ability to filter RAs and DHCPv6.
-Jack
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Loch (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion John Schnizlein (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Chuck Anderson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Aria Stewart (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leen Besselink (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion sthaug (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Leo Bicknell (Feb 18)