nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:25:37 +1100
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 11:57:36AM +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
OK. Following myself up, and referencing a link someone else gave me in regards to IPv6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network Has the entry: Private use of other reserved addresses Several other address ranges, in addition to the official private ranges, are reserved for other or future uses, including 1.0.0.0/8 and 2.0.0.0/8[1]. In recent years, large companies have begun to use this address space internally.
[citation required] - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Conrad (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Måns Nilsson (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space James R. Cutler (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Adrian Chadd (Feb 02)