nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Dorn Hetzel <dhetzel () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:11:03 -0500
Does anyone actually use any part of 0/8 other than 0/32 for self identification? On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org> wrote:
On 02/02/2009 10:45, "Dorn Hetzel" <dhetzel () gmail com> wrote:On a related note, do you think that 0.0.0.0/8 <http://0.0.0.0/8>(excluding0.0.0.0/32 <http://0.0.0.0/32> , of course :) ) will be feasible for allocation and use ?0.0.0.0/8 is reserved for self-identification. See RFC 1700: (b) {0, <Host-number>} Specified host on this network. Can only be used as a source address. Regards, Leo Vegoda
Current thread:
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joe Greco (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space TSG (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Feb 02)