nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:56:05 -0800
On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 11:57:36AM +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote:OK.Following myself up, and referencing a link someone else gave me in regardsto IPv6 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network Has the entry: Private use of other reserved addressesSeveral other address ranges, in addition to the official private ranges, are reserved for other or future uses, including 1.0.0.0/8 and 2.0.0.0/8[1].In recent years, large companies have begun to use this address space internally.[citation required] - Matt
I've added a blurb to this page expressing the risks associated with such
use. Owen
Current thread:
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Måns Nilsson (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space James R. Cutler (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Adrian Chadd (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Seth Mattinen (Feb 02)