nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: David Coulson <david () davidcoulson net>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:58:21 -0500
I'm curious - Any particular technical reason not to assign out of 0.0.0.0/8? Can't say I've ever tried to use it, but I'd think it should work.
David Conrad wrote:
Is this true?This will cause endless entertainment when IANA allocates 1.0.0.0/8 sometime within the next two or three years...
Current thread:
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Stephen Sprunk (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Michael Butler (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Leo Vegoda (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Dorn Hetzel (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Conrad (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bruce Grobler (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space David Coulson (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Ricky Beam (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Måns Nilsson (Feb 04)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Randy Bush (Feb 04)