nanog mailing list archives
Re: The real issue
From: Shane Ronan <sronan () fattoc com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:58:36 -0700
But you are okay with them raising your fees to go to court left and right to enforce the declarations made by CEO's of companies who are happily paying the fees for the space they've been assigned.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
1) I don't care to pay higher member fees because ARIN has been going to court left and right.
Current thread:
- The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Mike Lewinski (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Crooks, Sam (Apr 21)
- IPv6-capable hardware? Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 21)