nanog mailing list archives
Re: The real issue
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:49:33 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Christopher Morrow wrote:
arin never (nor do any RIR) guarantee routability, nor do they even a method to affect routability of a network.
Sure they do. They can and have put pressure on networks to stop advertisements from being propagated. What they can actually do if their bluff is called, I have no idea, but I've seen their influence work.
2) Have the current "owner" pay the market rate for the IP space... that's somewhat hard since the current policies don't support that, and there is no real legal stance for legacy-allocations... For allocated post-legacy-times ARIN can start court proceedings, but ... that's a lengthy process and expensive.
Having looked back at old copies of the domain-template.txt and internet-number-template.txt, I really don't see why one group was grandfathered in with an indefinite free ride and the other was not at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Re: The real issue, (continued)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Mike Lewinski (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- RE: The real issue Crooks, Sam (Apr 21)
- IPv6-capable hardware? Jack Bates (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 21)
- Re: The real issue Jorge Amodio (Apr 23)
- RE: The real issue Murphy, Jay, DOH (Apr 23)