nanog mailing list archives

RE: Fiber cut in SF area


From: Peter Beckman <beckman () angryox com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:12:29 -0400

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Scott Weeks wrote:



--- beckman () angryox com wrote:

I still think skipping the securing of manholes and access
points in favor of active monitoring with offsite access is a
better solution.

The only thing missing from your plan was a cost analysis.  Cost of each,
plus operational costs, * however many of each type.  How much would that
be?

 So, let's see.  I'm pulling numbers out of my butt here, but basing it on
 non-quantity-discounted hardware available off the shelf.
-----------------------------------------


Manpower to design, build, maintain, train folks and monitor in the NOC.
Costs of EMS, its maintenance.  blah, blah, blah...

 My estimates are for getting something off the ground, equipment-wise, not
 operationally.

 What is the cost of the outages?  And if this setup can detect un-reported
 backhoe activity via accelerometers BEFORE it slices through the cable and
 you can get someone out to investigate the activity before it gets cut,
 how much is that worth?

 And my estimate was for the hardware, not training, etc.  I'm guessing
 existing NOCs can easily incorporate new SNMP traps or other methods of
 alerts into their system fairly easily.

Beckman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Beckman                                                  Internet Guy
beckman () angryox com                                 http://www.angryox.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: