nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fiber cut in SF area
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:00:59 -0700
--- beckman () angryox com wrote:
I still think skipping the securing of manholes and access points in favor of active monitoring with offsite access is a better solution.The only thing missing from your plan was a cost analysis. Cost of each, plus operational costs, * however many of each type. How much would that be?
So, let's see. I'm pulling numbers out of my butt here, but basing it on non-quantity-discounted hardware available off the shelf. ----------------------------------------- Manpower to design, build, maintain, train folks and monitor in the NOC. Costs of EMS, its maintenance. blah, blah, blah... scott
Current thread:
- RE: Fiber cut in SF area, (continued)
- RE: Fiber cut in SF area Sean Donelan (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Mike Lyon (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Ravi Pina (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Roy (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Mike Lyon (Apr 11)
- RE: Fiber cut in SF area Sean Donelan (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Jorge Amodio (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Roy (Apr 11)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Joel Jaeggli (Apr 11)
- RE: Fiber cut in SF area Peter Beckman (Apr 13)
- RE: Fiber cut in SF area Crist Clark (Apr 13)
- RE: Fiber cut in SF area Peter Beckman (Apr 13)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Nathan Ward (Apr 13)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Jack Bates (Apr 13)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area telmnstr (Apr 13)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Jack Bates (Apr 13)
- Re: Fiber cut in SF area Daryl G. Jurbala (Apr 13)