nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI

From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:19:55 +0000 (GMT)



On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Henning Brauer wrote:


* Cliff Albert <cliff () oisec net> [2004-11-28 13:13]:

Therefore I also agree with daniel that there is not really a problem
with the 1 ASN == 1 IPv6 Prefix.


unless I miss something in that proposal that means that we'll see a
dramatic increase in ASNs - I mean, it is not like only organizations
with an ASN assigned have v4 space now. If they have their portable
address space now, why should they suddenly accept that they had to
renumber when changing providers?


additionally not all portable space is use by asn carrying orgs...

Current thread:

Re: Sensible geographical addressing, (continued)
- - - Re: Sensible geographical addressing Peter Corlett (Nov 30)
    - Re: Sensible geographical addressing David Barak (Nov 30)
    - RE: Sensible geographical addressing Scott Morris (Nov 30)
    - Re: Sensible geographical addressing Bill Woodcock (Nov 30)
    - RE: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Scott Morris (Nov 30)
    - Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 30)
    - RE: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Scott Morris (Nov 30)
    - Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 29)
    - Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
    - Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
    - Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 28)
    - Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Tony Li (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Robert E . Seastrom (Nov 29)
    - RE: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Scott Morris (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Jeff Kell (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Wayne E. Bouchard (Nov 29)
    - Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Hank Nussbacher (Nov 30)

(Thread continues...)