nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:45:12 -0800
My preference lies in making the policies a lot stricter, and actively verifying current delegations. I see a lot of ASN's requested just for fun with no real motive behind it.
I think this is already the case, at least with ARIN... I have definitely had to thoroughly justify each and every ASN I have received from them in the last 2 years (total of 6). In fact, I think it was actually harder to get an ASN than to get v4 prefixes in that same time period. I think it is not unreasonable to work towards a policy of 1 AS gets at least one IPv6 prefix and no AS can originate more than one prefix longer than /32 (/33-/64). I think that combined with the current policies towards ASN issuance is probably reasonable routing table size. Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Sensible geographical addressing, (continued)
- Re: Sensible geographical addressing David Barak (Nov 30)
- RE: Sensible geographical addressing Scott Morris (Nov 30)
- Re: Sensible geographical addressing Bill Woodcock (Nov 30)
- RE: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Scott Morris (Nov 30)
- Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 30)
- RE: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda] Scott Morris (Nov 30)
- Re: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs [Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI] Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Tony Li (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Robert E . Seastrom (Nov 29)
- RE: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Scott Morris (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Jeff Kell (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Daniel Senie (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Wayne E. Bouchard (Nov 29)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Hank Nussbacher (Nov 30)
- Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Nov 30)