nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:45:54 -0800



--On Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:21 PM +0100 Henning Brauer <hb-nanog () bsws de> wrote:


* Cliff Albert <cliff () oisec net> [2004-11-28 13:13]:
Therefore I also agree with daniel that there is not really a problem
with the 1 ASN == 1 IPv6 Prefix.

unless I miss something in that proposal that means that we'll see a
dramatic increase in ASNs - I mean, it is not like only organizations
with an ASN assigned have v4 space now. If they have their portable
address space now, why should they suddenly accept that they had to
renumber when changing providers?

Why should they go to v6 at all?

Owen


--
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: