nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 23:49:42 +0100
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:35:49PM -0800, william(at)elan.net wrote:
ipv6 tunnels are seen as good thing (rightly so)
Eh? Not really. Perhaps in developing countries regarding IPv6, but other regions have moved on to native deployment. :-P And now off to some new year's eve partying... :-) Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Sam Stickland (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Stephen Sprunk (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Rob Thomas (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection william(at)elan.net (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection bmanning (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection J. Oquendo (Dec 31)