nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection
From: Rob Thomas <robt () cymru com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 15:52:43 -0600 (CST)
Hi, NANOGers. Folks who are considering or using IPv6 should know that the miscreants are as well. There have been IPv6 bots and botnets. IPv6 based hosts are regularly used as a bounce for IRC access. IPv6 DoS tools do exist. Many of your monitoring tools choke on IPv6, or ignore it entirely. So while a new approach to security with IPv6 may be warranted, many of the same old threats await you there. Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com Shaving with Occam's razor since 1999.
Current thread:
- IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Sam Stickland (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Stephen Sprunk (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Rob Thomas (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection william(at)elan.net (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection bmanning (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection J. Oquendo (Dec 31)