nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:10:09 +0100
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 10:46:56AM -0800, Merike Kaeo wrote:
An IPv6 network is sufficiently different from IPv4 that I encourage folks to not simply slap an IPv4 security model onto future IPv6 networks.
Can you elaborate on "sufficiently different" please? Especially on details which make anything _conceptually_ different for security? Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Sam Stickland (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Stephen Sprunk (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Rob Thomas (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection william(at)elan.net (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection bmanning (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Daniel Roesen (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection Merike Kaeo (Dec 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and deep packet inspection J. Oquendo (Dec 31)