nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 14 Apr 2004 04:04:58 +0000
chris () eff org (Chris Palmer) writes:
When evaluating spam solutions, the first thing I ask is, "Does this empower users?" If the answer is no, it's probably the wrong solution.
right now the spammers are holding the users hostage: "if you want to be able to read mail from people/hosts you've not been formally introduced to, then you have to swallow our swill also." that's somewhat the opposite of empowerment. if a "spam solution" can take away that crisis and the expense is that my dsl-connected end host has to tunnel its e-mail to someplace out in <www.vix.com/personalcolo> then that's a tradeoff i can live with. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators joshua sahala (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Chris Palmer (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Crist Clark (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Rob Nelson (Apr 17)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT John Curran (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Vixie (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Alex Bligh (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Sean Donelan (Apr 18)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Paul Vixie (Apr 18)