nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:19:17 -0400
At 10:13 PM -0400 4/13/04, joshua sahala wrote:
so the malware writers start using port 80 through open proxies...they do already. or they go after the im client ports more. there are ways to send mail if 25 is blocked to me
Yep, there's no doubt we'd have to deal with the next round of creative approaches. I'd still wager we'd see a major decrease in spam as a result of some simple configuration. /John
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Joe Abley (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators JC Dill (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 15)
- Re: Lazy network operators joshua sahala (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Michael . Dillon (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Chris Palmer (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Petri Helenius (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Crist Clark (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Rob Nelson (Apr 17)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT Doug White (Apr 17)
- Re: Lazy network operators - NOT John Curran (Apr 17)