nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 19:20:59 -0400
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:05:31 BST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
software, or perhaps the OS will tend more in this direction for its user software and become more restrictive?
The truly odd part here is that there are already moves by the largest vendor to become more restrictive, mostly in response to the increase in popularity of alternatives seen as being simultaneously both more secure and less restrictive to the user.....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert Blayzor (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Deepak Jain (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Dan Hollis (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) J.D. Falk (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)