nanog mailing list archives
Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators)
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:53:20 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I can understand the reasoning behind what they are doing, but perhaps they are taking things in the wrong direction. Our abuse@ email address is just that, abused. Our abuse@ mailbox gets probably 500+ spams a day with maybe 2-3 legit emails that we need to look at. Sure we could run
I'm not sure people actually understand the scope of what some ISPs have to deal with. Scaling to handle 6.8 million abuse complaints a day is hard. Despite calling them "lazy network operators" some of them work very hard in a thankless job. According to the Washington Post America Online says it has seen a dramatic decline in spam over the past month, due to improved filtering techniques and fear of litigation under a new U.S. law. In a one-month period ending March 20, customer complaints about spam nearly halved to 6.8 million per day, the Time Warner Inc. unit said. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3300-2004Apr11.html
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 11)
- Re: Lazy network operators Avleen Vig (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert Blayzor (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert Blayzor (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven Champeon (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Deepak Jain (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Dan Hollis (Apr 12)