nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: George William Herbert <gherbert () retro com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:47:25 -0700
Suresh writes: Chris Boyd writes:
NTL World no longer accepts abuse@ email. You have to go to a web form that requires javascript be enabled and enter all of the information for them. I guess that they got tired of processing the the abuse@ mail load and just bit bucketed it.NTL peers at Linx, right? I'm sure somebody's mentioned http://www.linx.net/noncore/bcp/ube-bcp.html to them?
None of the surrounding docs or linx membership agreement make compliance with linx BCPs mandatory. However, it is socially odorous at least. They're not the first ISP to do that, and won't be the last, but I don't do business with (and often, blackhole) those that do. -george william herbert gherbert () retro com
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators), (continued)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Deepak Jain (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Dan Hollis (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) J.D. Falk (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Sean Donelan (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Randy Bush (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Randy Bush (Apr 13)