nanog mailing list archives
Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () cybernothing org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:23:54 -0700
On 04/12/04, "Eric A. Hall" <ehall () ehsco com> wrote:
On 4/12/2004 2:53 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:I'm not sure people actually understand the scope of what some ISPs have to deal with.Percentage of revenues are about the same aren't they?
I doubt it. The spammers go after big providers much harder than smaller folks, and certainly much harder than any primarily personal domain (with only one exception that I know of.) -- J.D. Falk "be crazy dumbsaint of the mind" <jdfalk () cybernothing org> -- Jack Kerouac
Current thread:
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators), (continued)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Steve Atkins (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Richard Cox (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Deepak Jain (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Dan Hollis (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) Eric A. Hall (Apr 12)
- Re: Abuse mail boxese (was Re: Lazy network operators) J.D. Falk (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Sean Donelan (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)