nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lazy network operators
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:02:52 +0900
The reality is that the vast majority of email is handed off to a designated mail relay (whether we're talking about consumer connections or office environments), and if we actually configured connectivity in this matter, there wouldn't be a problem.
our innate fear of this stems from suspicion of centralization and the telco switch model. this fear is not clearly unjustified. maybe we can get reasonable security without a police state? randy
Current thread:
- Re: Lazy network operators, (continued)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators E.B. Dreger (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: Lazy network operators George William Herbert (Apr 10)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Sean Donelan (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Andrew - Supernews (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Randy Bush (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Randy Bush (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 14)
- Routing issues Simon Brilus (Apr 14)
- Re: Routing issues Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 14)
- Re: Routing issues Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 13)
- Re: Routing issues Nick Feamster (Apr 14)
- Re: Lazy network operators Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 13)
- Re: Lazy network operators John Curran (Apr 13)