nanog mailing list archives

Re: Fun new policy at AOL

From: Johnny Eriksson <bygg () cafax se>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:36:36 WET DST


Matthew Crocker <matthew () crocker com> wrote:

Technically no,  There is no reason for a customer to have direct 
access to the net so long as the ISP can provide appropriate proxies 
for the services required.


Good idea.  I'll start working on the SSH proxy tomorrow.

-Matt


--Johnny

Current thread:

RE: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL R. Benjamin Kessler (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jonathan Hunter (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL McBurnett, Jim (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 28)
  - Re: Fun new policy at AOL David Lesher (Aug 28)
    - RE: Fun new policy at AOL Jay Stewart (Aug 28)
    - Re: Fun new policy at AOL Paul Vixie (Aug 28)
  - Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
  - Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Simon Waters (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Johnny Eriksson (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Susan Zeigler (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Dr. Jeffrey Race (Aug 28)
  - Re: Fun new policy at AOL Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Dr. Jeffrey Race (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 28)
  - Re: Fun new policy at AOL Ray Wong (Aug 28)
  - RE: Fun new policy at AOL Gary E. Miller (Aug 28)
    - Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 29)
  - Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)

(Thread continues...)