![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fun new policy at AOL
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:03:33 -0500
Gary E. Miller wrote:
Maybe if PacBell (and others) actually disciplined their more out of control DSL customers then other ISPs would not feel the need to do it for them.
It doesn't matter. A large percentage of open proxies are on dynamic DSL. Since a lot of ISPs will not handle proxy reports and take care of the problem, and the blacklists are about useless since the open proxy will switch IPs, it's just best to wipe out the entire dynamic range.
-Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Simon Waters (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Johnny Eriksson (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Susan Zeigler (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Dr. Jeffrey Race (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Dr. Jeffrey Race (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Ray Wong (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Gary E. Miller (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL JC Dill (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jack Bates (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Miquel van Smoorenburg (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Simon Lockhart (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Vivien M. (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 29)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Vivien M. (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Simon Lockhart (Aug 29)