nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fun new policy at AOL
From: "Michel Py" <michel () arneill-py sacramento ca us>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:11:20 -0700
Matthew Crocker wrote: Shouldn't customers that purchase IP services from an ISP use the ISPs mail server as a smart host for outbound mail?
Trouble is with some ISPs you get more rejections when using their mail servers than when havong your own, not to mention theirs eating some email from no reason, having limits in attachment size, you can't have a mailing list that way, etc. Michel.
Current thread:
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL JC Dill (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Nathan J. Mehl (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Joe Provo (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL up (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL R. Benjamin Kessler (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Jonathan Hunter (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL McBurnett, Jim (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Michel Py (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL David Lesher (Aug 28)
- RE: Fun new policy at AOL Jay Stewart (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Paul Vixie (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL David Lesher (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)