nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
From: Steve Schaefer <schaefer () dashbit com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:50:12 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
Something bothers me about this thread, and I think it is the assertion that there is a proper definition for 'NAP' as differentiated from 'IXP' or what not.yup. george santayana was right
You mean "History is always written wrong, and so always needs to be rewritten." or "Intolerance is a form of egotism, and to condemn egotism intolerantly is to share it." or something else?
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Paul Vixie (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Alan Hannan (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Steve Schaefer (Jan 29)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF David Luyer (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Mark Prior (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Patrick Evans (Jan 30)