nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:40:15 -0800

Something bothers me about this thread, and I think it is the
assertion that there is a proper definition for 'NAP' as
differentiated from 'IXP' or what not.


yup.  george santayana was right

Current thread:

Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF, (continued)
- - - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Paul Vixie (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
  - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Alan Hannan (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
    - Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Steve Schaefer (Jan 29)
    - RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF David Luyer (Jan 30)
    - RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Mark Prior (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF James Smith (Jan 29)
  - RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Patrick Evans (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Peter Ford (Jan 30)