nanog mailing list archives
RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
From: "Peter Ford" <peterf () Exchange Microsoft com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:22:21 -0800
Looks like all of you can use the scheduled time to establish a glossary so that you understand why you are at the NAP BoF. Or perhaps there needs to be a liaison established to an established Internet Etymology and Terminology Forum. Apologies in advance and in arrears, peter -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:40 PM To: Alan Hannan Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
Something bothers me about this thread, and I think it is the assertion that there is a proper definition for 'NAP' as differentiated from 'IXP' or what not.
yup. george santayana was right
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Alan Hannan (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Steve Schaefer (Jan 29)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF David Luyer (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Mark Prior (Jan 30)
- RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Patrick Evans (Jan 30)