nanog mailing list archives

RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF


From: "Peter Ford" <peterf () Exchange Microsoft com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 00:22:21 -0800



Looks like all of you can use the scheduled time to establish a glossary
so that you understand why you are at the NAP BoF.  

Or perhaps there needs to be a liaison established to an established
Internet Etymology and Terminology Forum.

Apologies in advance and in arrears, peter


-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Alan Hannan
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF


Something bothers me about this thread, and I think it is the
assertion that there is a proper definition for 'NAP' as
differentiated from 'IXP' or what not.

yup.  george santayana was right


Current thread: