nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () as vix com>
Date: 29 Jan 2002 17:58:00 -0800
I don't think anything I've said argues for the concept of tiers in
relation to exchanges.
Oh foo. You mean we won't be treated to an argument about who is in Tier 0?
Current thread:
- NANOG 24: NAP BoF Mike Hughes (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Paul Vixie (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Alan Hannan (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Steve Schaefer (Jan 29)