nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:06:56 +0000 (UCT)
Not! www.ep.net Randy Bush wrote:i believe there are/were only four NAPs, so scheduling should not be a problem. randy
Richard, Friend Bush has tounge firmly in cheek. He refers to the US NSF NAPs, not the generic term Network Access Point, sometimes called Exchange Point, or Internet eXchange. I 'spect he is trolling. --bill
Current thread:
- NANOG 24: NAP BoF Mike Hughes (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Paul Vixie (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF bmanning (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Richard Irving (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Randy Bush (Jan 29)
- Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF Bill Woodcock (Jan 29)