nanog mailing list archives
Re: Statements against new.net?
From: Clayton Fiske <clay () bloomcounty org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:06:57 -0800
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:05:15AM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
I buy that as a reason for you not to use them, and I buy that as a reason for me not to use them. I don't buy it as a reason to make what they're doing illegal, which is what a few in this discussion are advocating. That'd be like making IPX illegal, because it prevents those machines from properly interoperating with TCP/IP.
While I don't advocate making it illegal (well, not moreso than I do for any other irresponsible act), your analogy misses the mark. I fail to see how I could enter an IP address as a destination and have it go to a different destination because the IPX network carried it there. *waits for tongue-in-cheek replies about tunneling* -c
Current thread:
- RE: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 17)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? mdevney (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Clayton Fiske (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen Stuart (Mar 14)